What object-oriented programming is NOT

I’ve made this argument several times, but object-oriented programming is MORE (much more) than knowing how to write a class. It’s a “paradigm” (as WikiPedia calls it) or a “model” (that’s Tech Target’s word). I call it an “approach”… but it’s an approach to application-building.

OOP is not about how you write your code… it’s about how you build your applications. That may not make sense, at first… but it is an important distinction. So, let’s look at some code and see if we can make this clear.

So, the first thing object-oriented programming is not is…

Object-Oriented Programming Is Not Writing a Class

You use classes, but that’s not what it IS. A lot of times what I see developers do is take a set of functions like this:

<?php
function my_func_one() {
    // do stuff
}

function my_func_two() {
    // do stuff
}

And, just do this with it:

<?php
class MyClass {
    function my_func_one() {
        // do stuff
    }
    
    function my_func_two() {
        // do stuff
    }
}

That’s not object-oriented programming… that’s namespacing. Which is fine, but you’d be better off just using actual namespaces like this:

<?php
namespace App\Functions;

function my_func_one() {
    // do stuff
}

function my_func_two() {
    // do stuff
}

// Note: prior to PHP 5.6 this wouldn't work because importing function and
// constant names wasn't supported. 5.6+ DOES support this.

It’s simpler syntax, it’s easier to update your existing procedural code and you’d being using the “right tool for the right job” in my opinion.

Object-Oriented Programming Is NOT Static

Another one I see is heavy use of the “static” keyword. So something like this:

<?php
class MyClass {
    public static function my_func_one() {
        // do stuff
    }
    public static function my_func_two() {
        // do stuff
    }
}

MyClass::my_func_one();
MyClass::my_func_two();

This is really the same mistake as before, just more fancy-looking. The reason you’d do this is to put your functions into a class and be able to call them in the procedural way you’re used to… but not have to “mess with all that instantiating nonsense”. This, again, is really just namespacing. (There are proper uses of “static” in OOP, but they’re fairly rare. So, if all or most of your class methods are static… that’s not object-oriented programming.)

Object-Oriented Programming Is NOT MVC

This will ruffle a few feathers probably, but OOP and MVC are, in fact, two different things. OOP is an “approach” (model, paradigm) to application-building. MVC is one, of many, application design patterns that employ OOP principles. So, you can “do OOP” without MVC.

I bring this up because MVC’s popularity (for good reason) tends to make people think that’s all there is. “If I’m gonna OOP, I gotta MVC.” But, there are plenty of other patterns out there… some of which I personally prefer to MVC.

That’s why in my object-oriented programming course, I show you MVC, but I also show you another design pattern… one I personally like better. To challenge you to think about it different ways and develop what works for you… not just follow what everyone else is doing.

That and a lot of the frameworks that employ MVC principles actually use a distorted form of it… but that’s a topic for another time.

What Object-Oriented Programming IS

I’ll re-iterate… it’s an entire “re-thinking” of how you build your applications. Procedural coding tends to focus on process over data. We think of what we need to DO first. We need to process this form data or edit this blog post. And, those processes tend to be what drives our application design decisions.

OOP is different. It focuses on the data first. Instead of breaking your applications down into processes, you break into down into objects. And, objects here is used in the general sense… a phone is an object, a remote is an object… these things are literal objects in the real world.

So, we build our applications in the same way we view the world in real life. We break a CMS down by “post”, “category”, “tag”, “author”, “comment”… and we think about our data model FIRST. Then, we write the code to create, read, update and delete.

It’s Not Your Fault

Now, I know you might feel like I’m ragging on you if you’ve done any of this stuff. I’m not. I did all the same stuff. Probably anyone who’s made the switch from procedural to object-oriented programming did this same stuff.

I think most coders’ minds are naturally oriented to think in processes. So, breaking out of that is difficult. But, ultimately, for large, complex applications OOP is a better way to build. It’s easier to think about your application mentally in this way. Your code is often more organized. And, it’s more in line with how your end-user sees your application.

If you’d like to dive into all this more, then check out my object-oriented programming course. I’ll clear up all the confusion you might have surrounding OOP and show you how to build professional PHP applications using object-oriented programming.

Do you want high-paying freelance clients?

I’ll show you what I learned over the last 15 years about building a 100K freelance business from complete scratch. What I did to land projects with Inc. Magazine, Tim Ferris, Lewis Howes, Michael Hyatt and others. Just enter your email address in the box below and let’s get started:

Leave a Reply on Twitter

Due to excessive spam, I’ve disabled comments on my website. If you have a question or would like to leave a comment, don’t hesitate to contact me on Twitter.

You might also like

Hack Culture Needs to Die

Anybody else tired of “hack” culture? “7 Hacks to Triple Your…” “A Secret Hack to Instantly Double Your…” “52 Little-Known Hacks to…” I asked my

Read More »
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
John Morris

JOHN MORRIS

I’m a 15-year veteran of freelance web development. I’ve worked with bestselling authors and average Joe’s next door. These days, I focus on helping other freelancers build their freelance business and their lifestyles.

The simple secret to high-paying freelance clients?

Enter your email below and I’ll show how to charge more and build a 100K freelance business from scratch:

Clients Like:

Inc. Magazine Logo
Lewis Howes Logo
Ray Edwards Logo

WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING

Jason Rumley

Jason Rumley

John has a habit of over-delivering on the expectations he sets up. That’s why he’s the best.

Jim DeJonge

Jim DeJonge

John has a relaxed and engaging manner. His advice is solid and the explanations are well thought out.

Steve Dimmick

Steve Dimmick

John has provided expert knowledge and advice on multiple occasions that have helped me better serve my clients. John is a Rockstar!

Andrew Malone

Andrew Malone

John Morris is exceptional in his ability to give focused insight into Freelancing and starting one’s business. His direct methods inspire confidence in his honesty.

Lewis Howes

John is amazing at building membership sites. He converted one of my sites over from it’s existing (hardly working) platform over to the clean and simple to use WishList membership platform. I highly recommend using John and WishList for any of your membership site needs.

Xan Barksdale

Xan Barksdale

Very professional worker who is extremely knowledgable in WordPress and Wishlist Member. I would definitely hire again.

Bradley Smith

John and I have worked together on numerous projects. John is very quick and efficient and was a pleasure to work with.

Sukh Plaha

John is a fantastic and patient tutor, who is not just able to share knowledge and communicate it very effectively – but able to support one in applying it. However, I believe that John has a very rare ability to go further than just imparting knowledge and showing one how to apply it. He is able to innately provoke one’s curiosity when explaining and demonstrating concepts, to the extent that one can explore and unravel their own learning journey. Thanks very much John!

Daniel Mohlendick

On the Freelancing on Upwork course: “This is by far the best course i have watched on Skillshare!! Thank you so much.”

Michael Skye

Michael Skye

John is a man of integrity, who gives generously of himself to projects and people he cares about.

Bob Patterson

Not only is John a very talented programmer and developer, he is also an excellent communicator. He has a talent for taking complex subjects and communicating them in terms that anyone can understand. This is a rare combination. This ability has enabled me to take my skills and knowledge to the next level. Thank you John for for all that you do.

Lori Grant

John did an outstanding job on my project. I highly recommend him and look forward to working with him on future projects.

Aaron Gott

Aaron Gott

John has a particular knack for the development and training of others.